Cursor Talk to Figma MCP
Uses Bun as the JavaScript runtime for the MCP server, allowing it to run the WebSocket server that facilitates communication between Cursor AI and the Figma plugin.
Enables communication with Figma for reading design information and modifying designs programmatically. Includes tools for document inspection, annotation management, element creation, text content modification, styling adjustments, layout organization, component handling, and exporting designs as images.
Implements the MCP server in TypeScript, providing type safety and better developer experience for interacting with Figma's API.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Cursor Talk to Figma MCPscan text nodes in the current selection and show me the first 5 results"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Cursor Talk to Figma MCP
This project implements a Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration between Cursor AI and Figma, allowing Cursor to communicate with Figma for reading designs and modifying them programmatically.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/129a14d2-ed73-470f-9a4c-2240b2a4885c
Project Structure
src/talk_to_figma_mcp/- TypeScript MCP server for Figma integrationsrc/cursor_mcp_plugin/- Figma plugin for communicating with Cursorsrc/socket.ts- WebSocket server that facilitates communication between the MCP server and Figma plugin
Related MCP server: Figma MCP Server
Get Started
Install Bun if you haven't already:
curl -fsSL https://bun.sh/install | bashRun setup, this will also install MCP in your Cursor's active project
bun setupStart the Websocket server
bun socketMCP server
bunx cursor-talk-to-figma-mcpInstall Figma Plugin
Quick Video Tutorial
Design Automation Example
Bulk text content replacement
Thanks to @dusskapark for contributing the bulk text replacement feature. Here is the demo video.
Manual Setup and Installation
MCP Server: Integration with Cursor
Add the server to your Cursor MCP configuration in ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"TalkToFigma": {
"command": "bunx",
"args": ["cursor-talk-to-figma-mcp@latest"]
}
}
}WebSocket Server
Start the WebSocket server:
bun socketFigma Plugin
In Figma, go to Plugins > Development > New Plugin
Choose "Link existing plugin"
Select the
src/cursor_mcp_plugin/manifest.jsonfileThe plugin should now be available in your Figma development plugins
Windows + WSL Guide
Install bun via powershell
powershell -c "irm bun.sh/install.ps1|iex"Uncomment the hostname
0.0.0.0insrc/socket.ts
// uncomment this to allow connections in windows wsl
hostname: "0.0.0.0",Start the websocket
bun socketUsage
Start the WebSocket server
Install the MCP server in Cursor
Open Figma and run the Cursor MCP Plugin
Connect the plugin to the WebSocket server by joining a channel using
join_channelUse Cursor to communicate with Figma using the MCP tools
MCP Tools
The MCP server provides the following tools for interacting with Figma:
Document & Selection
get_document_info- Get information about the current Figma documentget_selection- Get information about the current selectionread_my_design- Get detailed node information about the current selection without parametersget_node_info- Get detailed information about a specific nodeget_nodes_info- Get detailed information about multiple nodes by providing an array of node IDs
Annotations
get_annotations- Get all annotations in the current document or specific nodeset_annotation- Create or update an annotation with markdown supportset_multiple_annotations- Batch create/update multiple annotations efficientlyscan_nodes_by_types- Scan for nodes with specific types (useful for finding annotation targets)
Creating Elements
create_rectangle- Create a new rectangle with position, size, and optional namecreate_frame- Create a new frame with position, size, and optional namecreate_text- Create a new text node with customizable font properties
Modifying text content
scan_text_nodes- Scan text nodes with intelligent chunking for large designsset_text_content- Set the text content of a single text nodeset_multiple_text_contents- Batch update multiple text nodes efficiently
Styling
set_fill_color- Set the fill color of a node (RGBA)set_stroke_color- Set the stroke color and weight of a nodeset_corner_radius- Set the corner radius of a node with optional per-corner control
Layout & Organization
move_node- Move a node to a new positionresize_node- Resize a node with new dimensionsdelete_node- Delete a nodedelete_multiple_nodes- Delete multiple nodes at once efficientlyclone_node- Create a copy of an existing node with optional position offset
Components & Styles
get_styles- Get information about local stylesget_local_components- Get information about local componentscreate_component_instance- Create an instance of a component
Export & Advanced
export_node_as_image- Export a node as an image (PNG, JPG, SVG, or PDF) - limited support on image currently returning base64 as text
Connection Management
join_channel- Join a specific channel to communicate with Figma
Development
Building the Figma Plugin
Navigate to the Figma plugin directory:
cd src/cursor_mcp_pluginEdit code.js and ui.html
Best Practices
When working with the Figma MCP:
Always join a channel before sending commands
Get document overview using
get_document_infofirstCheck current selection with
get_selectionbefore modificationsUse appropriate creation tools based on needs:
create_framefor containerscreate_rectanglefor basic shapescreate_textfor text elements
Verify changes using
get_node_infoUse component instances when possible for consistency
Handle errors appropriately as all commands can throw exceptions
For large designs:
Use chunking parameters in
scan_text_nodesMonitor progress through WebSocket updates
Implement appropriate error handling
For text operations:
Use batch operations when possible
Consider structural relationships
Verify changes with targeted exports
For converting legacy annotations:
Scan text nodes to identify numbered markers and descriptions
Use
scan_nodes_by_typesto find UI elements that annotations refer toMatch markers with their target elements using path, name, or proximity
Categorize annotations appropriately with
get_annotationsCreate native annotations with
set_multiple_annotationsin batchesVerify all annotations are properly linked to their targets
Delete legacy annotation nodes after successful conversion
License
MIT
Available Tools
33 toolsclone_nodeB
Clone an existing node in Figma
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | Yes | The ID of the node to clone | |
| x | No | New X position for the clone | |
| y | No | New Y position for the clone |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations available, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic action, omitting details like whether children are copied, if the clone gets a new ID, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that conveys the core purpose without any wasteful words. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple clone operation with only three parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks information about return values or default behavior (e.g., what happens if x/y are omitted), which would make it more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are already fully documented. The description adds no additional parameter-level context beyond what the schema provides, earning the baseline score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Clone' with the resource 'an existing node in Figma', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like move_node or resize_node. There is no ambiguity about the tool's primary action.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as create_rectangle or create_component_instance. No exclusions or preferred contexts are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
create_component_instanceC
Create an instance of a component in Figma
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| componentKey | Yes | Key of the component to instantiate | |
| x | Yes | X position | |
| y | Yes | Y position |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description bears the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Create an instance' without stating that this mutates the document, whether a loaded file is required, what the return value is, or any coordinate system assumptions. This is a significant gap for a creation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is seven words long and wastes no words. However, it is essentially a restatement of the tool name with 'in Figma' appended, adding minimal new information. Still, its brevity is appropriate and it is front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 3 required parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It omits crucial operational context such as return value, coordinate space, and how to obtain a componentKey, and it does not position the tool among the many sibling editing operations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema descriptions cover 100% of parameters ('X position', 'Y position', 'Key of the component to instantiate'), so the description need not repeat them. The baseline of 3 applies because the description adds no additional semantic depth such as coordinate units or instructions on sourcing the componentKey.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb+resource ('Create an instance of a component') and mentions the context 'in Figma', which clearly conveys the tool's function. However, it does not distinguish from sibling creation tools like create_frame or create_text beyond the component-instance target, so it falls short of a 5.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites for obtaining a componentKey, and no mention of how to position the instance. There is no contrast with siblings like create_frame or clone_node, so the agent gets no decision support.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
create_frameC
Create a new frame in Figma
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| x | Yes | X position | |
| y | Yes | Y position | |
| width | Yes | Width of the frame | |
| height | Yes | Height of the frame | |
| name | No | Optional name for the frame | |
| parentId | No | Optional parent node ID to append the frame to | |
| fillColor |